Published in Lab Law Weekly, July 14th, 2006
The Complaint, filed and amended in December 2005, alleged violations of the California Business and Professions Code and the federal Lanham Act for allegedly false and misleading statements made by Insmed. In dismissing the Complaint, the Court ruled, among other things, that Tercica had not met its burden of establishing that the alleged statements made by Insmed constitute "false advertising", or that the Court had jurisdiction over...
Want to see the full article?
Welcome to NewsRx!
Learn more about a six-week, no-risk free trial of Lab Law Weekly
NewsRx also is available at LexisNexis, Gale, ProQuest, Factiva, Dialog, Thomson Reuters, NewsEdge, and Dow Jones.