Law & Health Weekly
Welcome to NewsRx!
Learn more about a six-week, no-risk free trial of Law & Health Weekly
We're a pay-per-view site for premium content. If you'd like to purchase this article, it's only $3.00.
Behavior
New behavior research has been reported by scientists at University of North Texas
November 8th, 2008
"Despite the fact that scholars of judicial politics have developed reasonably well-specified models of the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices, little attention has been paid to influences on the consistency of the choices justices make," researchers in the United States report. "Aside from the methodological problems associated with failure to account for heteroskedasticity with regard to the justices' voting behavior, I argue that variance in judicial choice is also of theoretical import. Simply put, by uncovering Influences on the stability of judicial choice, a more complete understanding of judicial decision making is provided. I explore this...
Source: Law & Health Weekly (2008-11-08)
|
