NewsRx Logo Login/Signup
Home Newsletters Products Library About Us Contact -- Search NewsRx

NewsRx | Free Trials
Advertisement
VerticalNews | Global Warming
Advertisement
NewsRx | Free Trials
Advertisement
----------
------------
NewsRx on Facebook
-----
Press Release Submissions
PR Login
*
*

Women's Health Weekly

Welcome to NewsRx!

Learn more about a six-week, no-risk free trial of Women's Health Weekly

Learn More

We're a pay-per-view site for premium content. If you'd like to purchase this article, it's only $3.00.

Buy Now



Breast Cancer



Soft copy and hard copy readings of mammograms are typically comparable



May 13th, 2004

Soft copy and hard copy readings of mammograms are typically comparable.

"The objective of this study was to compare soft copy reading at a mammography work station with hard copy reading of full-field digital mammographic images. Mammograms of 60 patients (n=29 malignant, n=31 benign) performed with full-field digital mammography (Senographe 2000D, GE, Buc, France) were evaluated. Reading was performed based on hard copy prints (Scopix, Agfa, Leverkusen, Germany) and on 2 k x 2.5 k high-resolution monitors (Sun Ultra 60, Sun Microsystems, Palo Alto, California, USA)," investigators in Germany report.

"Four readers with different levels of experience...


Source: Women's Health Weekly (2004-05-13)

NewsRx Passes
Advertisement
More Articles

------------------------
Security by Verisign PR Login